In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to improve students’ social involvement. This has led to the suggestion that the school authorities should integrate unpaid community service into the high school curriculum. From my perspective, this constructive idea is completely viable, albeit some manageable demerits.
Admittedly, some parents argue doing unpaid community service is time-consuming and stressful considering the fact that schoolwork and health should be always prioritized. Students are always busy at the end of each semester, during which they need to juggle their school commitment and voluntary jobs. Being overwhelmed with too much obligation, they might find it physically and mentally challenging to get everything done well. However, this does not necessarily imply/mean that students should shy away from volunteering.
In fact, volunteering can help students become a mature and well-rounded person in the future. For example, helping the disabled and elderly in hospital will develop their sense of sympathy. Moreover, the altruistic activities volunteering can also build a sense of social responsibility as they are part of the community as well. There is some evidence that students may gain a sense of belonging and recognition after showing devotion to their community.
In conclusion, the idea of making community service a mandatory high school program is completely feasible. In spite of the concern for wasting time, volunteering aids students in fostering a sense of compassion and responsibility, both of which will definitely help them with their future life or career. Hence, high school students should dedicate/devote more time and energy to this meaning work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... it physically and mentally challenging to get everything done well. However, this doe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6833976834 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13289952054 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0812674776 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18941418364 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626183979279 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535285734107 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113708900979 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301421205048 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.