Some people believe that we have too many choices these days. To what extent to you agree or disagree?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The revolutionary advancement in modern technology has endowed people with substantial resources for their survival in the best possible way. The availability of variety of facilities has enabled the people to choose inalienable beneficial opportunities to adopt in their lives. However, there are sections of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choices are out of reach, hence I partially agree with the view.
In the present era, human beings have exponentially increased the number of options to avail in different fields like food, transport and business due to many reasons. Firstly, the creative methods to produce variety of food and its preservation have benefitted human population with provision of significant types of edibles during the entire year. For instance, non-seasonals can be bought from the food market irrespective of the weather conditions due to modernized preservation methods. Secondly, while traveling, we can opt for many choices, according to affordability and convenience, due to inventions of faster ways of transportation leading to revolution in transport hubs. Furthermore, the advancement in education and development has endowed people with availability of enormous number of professional fields to succeed in their lives.
There are, however, unequal distribution of positive aspects of technology. Many underdeveloped countries are lacking the basic necessities to survive like food, health and financial resources. Instead of having choices, they do not have an option to avail the fundamental human rights. To illustrate, the research data by WHO shows that 45% of population does not have access to clean water supply; 35% people are spending a substandard life. Moreover, certain job and study courses are limited to developed countries only, leaving others devoid of these advantages.
In the light of the arguments I have hitherto considered, this conclusion is evident that, undoubtedly, people have access to many choices to enjoy in their lives but there is unequal distribution of beneficial resources. Everyone should have equal approach to all types of advantageous impacts of modern technology , and foremost, there should be provision of at least fundamental human rights.
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas 73
- Overall it is seen that there is a better order for the cars because whereas in 2007 the staff car park and the public car park occupied the same location in 2010 both parking spaces were separated Furthermore there have been significant changes in infras 67
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016
- Some people say that companies who sponsor big games can gain a lot other people believe that it has disadvantages for them Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilities has enabled the people to choose inalienable beneficial opportunities to ...
^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... sections of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choic...
^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ions of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choices are out of reac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these choices are out of reach, hence I partially agree with the view. In t...
^^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hence I partially agree with the view. In the present era, human beings have ex...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood and its preservation have benefitted human population with provision of signi...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...nderdeveloped countries are lacking the basic necessities to survive like food, health and financ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are limited to developed countries only, leaving others devoid of these advantage...
^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dvantageous impacts of modern technology , and foremost, there should be provision...
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provisioned'?
Suggestion: provisioned
...hnology , and foremost, there should be provision of at least fundamental human rights.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65882352941 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14523477414 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579411764706 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7843702088 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120181829041 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377891119155 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348602172807 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747259498632 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143220139558 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.