Some people claim that not enough of waste from home is recycled. they say that the only way to increase the recycling is for government to make legal requirement.
To what extend that laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
The Land pollution is if not consider biggest, is huge problem world is encountering today. According to many arguments that most of house hold disposal are not being reused, the only step to enhance the idea of recycling, Government should make legislative requirement. In this essay we will discuss firstly, why people are not reusing their waste? and secondly, rules and regulation by administration to tackled this problem. but I completely second the role of legislation in this context.
It is clear that most of domestic waste disposed off without any further treatment and recycling. Because nowadays life become more hectic and at the same time convenient, people do not find enough time for recycling. And most of ready-made thing available therefore most of them consider it cumbersome this process. For example, 50 tons of food wasted daily only by domestic use. It could be utilized as organic fertilizer but presence of chemical fertilizer in markets lessen its advantage. By the report of daily mail in 20000 this percentage was 10% less as compare today.
The main solution of decreasing disposal by government policies which bound their citizens. By giving subsides on environmental friendly products buying and selling. In Germany for instance people get money on return of plastic bottles and the government recycle it. By implementing strick regulation about charge the people according to their amount. This would probably increased the likelihood of recycling and regeneration of trash. Eventually, leads to decreasing the global pollution problems.
In this essay we discussed the reasons of not being reused appropriate rubbish because of people laziness. But if Authorities make strick legal requirement, this would possibly whittled down the environment hazards. In conclusion I strongly believe that world policy should be made and also rise the public awarness multiple uses of waste products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...why people are not reusing their waste? and secondly, rules and regulation by admin...
^^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...administration to tackled this problem. but I completely second the role of legisla...
^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...l in 20000 this percentage was 10% less as compare today. The main solution of de...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ng to their amount. This would probably increased the likelihood of recycling and regener...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'whittle'
Suggestion: whittle
... legal requirement, this would possibly whittled down the environment hazards. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85913937815 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624584717608 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4640794285 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.2 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203746666788 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523117128542 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529729568528 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118052728389 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352302659183 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.