Recycling domestic wastes are becoming much-discussed issue in states in order to find highly efficient measures to reduce the amount of wastes entered to the environment. It seems that employing practical laws may be impressive rather than dedicating the recycling to fellow citizens.
The most fundamental pace begins with authorities, meaning that they should prepare civic infrastructures by setting up various recycle bins near the residences to encourage people consuming them. However, it does not mean that by seeing such facilities, recycling definitely would be considered by them. Because, they are always seeking convenience and find separating waste time consuming. Therefore, government by obliging taxation and labeling recycles waste can force them to recycling. On the other hand, if labeled bins did not contain separated stuffs the amount of tax would be soared an a penalty. Furthermore, recycling and producing recycled materials and products are extremely prohibitive process while it can partially combat with pollutants entered to the atmosphere by tailing off wastes burnt in landfills. This process needs government supervision to curb the pollution and urge people by legally enforcing them.
Admittedly, recycling rubbish by people is highly delight progress in terms of reducing added costs for recycling by the government itself. However, it is optimistic opinion to expect all people to recycle their waste by considering their grave living conditions.
To conclude, it should be considered that people’s life style because of their work burden can be an obstacle for thinking about recycling and government should employs some laws in order to persuade people for recycling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...tuffs the amount of tax would be soared an a penalty. Furthermore, recycling and pro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'delighted'.
Suggestion: delighted
..., recycling rubbish by people is highly delight progress in terms of reducing added cos...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93682863684 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8545405482 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358475486068 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131870046816 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652879490089 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228657097604 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498547606047 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.