Similarity among countries and the effects of this issue on economy and industry are very challenging and complicated subject, leading to advantages and drawbacks. I will explain both sides in this statement.
On the one hand, thanks to technology, people are becoming more familiar with the life conditions of individuals in different states and the products used, ranging from appliances, private cars and above all fundamental facilities and amenities. This causes that appealing for similar products increases significantly which are not available in their state. Furthermore, by lack of proper import infrastructures to response demands, applicant’s appeals will not be covered, leading to lack of self-confidence in short-term and psychological disorders in long-term. This means that for increasing livelihood among individuals in order to have more contented society, providing universally common products should be considered as a compulsory.
On the other hand, by increasing appeals, a country will increase its imports, which also can provide opportunities for its members to create and produce high quality goods, by which I mean companies that want to produce similar high quality products and materials will try to employ creative ideas to export their own products too. The second issue is that by international trades, states will be inclined to positive competition with each other, leading to have boosting industry that improves economy. This makes companies to compete globally and have a progressive rout, helping to have prosperous future.
To conclude, not affordability of people for buying products produced universally will be able to diminish life standards, resulting low life expectancy. However, having a competitive relations with other developed countries for increasing imports and exports can help the state’s reliability in economy and industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...appealing for similar products increases significantly which are not available in...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have prosperous future. To conclude, not affordability of people for buying p...
^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ordability of people for buying products produced universally will be able to dim...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relation'?
Suggestion: relation
...pectancy. However, having a competitive relations with other developed countries for incr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, as to, i mean, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.775 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13039534244 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1379532391 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178448544796 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725388600681 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423453334229 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113472974589 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320370229694 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.