Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Waste recycling seems to be an increasingly widespread problem in recent decades. It is said that individuals are less responsible for these issues and it is necessary for governments to have an intervention by giving strict rules. In my perspective, law applying is not the only measure that the government should take.
Waste recycling is an action to protect the environment by the way of separating the waste into two main categories: organic and inorganic waste. The governments could make it an obligatory law for householders to follow this waste separation process before disposing of. The punishments will be applied to those who fail to adhere to this rule, ranging from the lowest form like paying a fine to the highest level of putting into prison, which depends on the frequency of offending.
However, introducing a law is not the only effective solution to reduce this environmental problem. Instead, the possible measure comes from education. Waste recycling should be acted as a compulsory subject in educational programs. For example, the school should teach children knowledge of recycling, for them to have a sense of environmental protection, which leads to a gradual increase in waste separation awareness when they grow up. Furthermore, politicians should hold a recycling campaign for homeowners to understand the dire impacts of home waste.
Another tactic that the governments should take steps is investing money on improving facilities and system which support the waste recycling process, regardless of whether householders separate it in the right way or not
In conclusion, it seems to me that in addition to introducing a law to waste recycling, the governments should take other measures to tackle this environmental problem
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34532374101 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09524797269 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.4491518922 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27357375543 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104046617361 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527650803368 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151708345289 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417351353126 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.