These days, the wastes from home are increasing more than in the part. I express the idea that the governments should reduce it a legal requirement recycled from home.
In begging, some people has not known or response to recycled from home because they think that governments would do the recycled after they take the wastes from people home. Because of this, who has not responsible. Therefore, governments should provide a trashcan for each family. For instance, in my house in the Netherlands, the governments had provided a container trash for the wastes to each family and each container trash had a color of its. For example, the green container is meant for gardens and food trash, the blue container is significant for papers and a black container is for plastics. It helps each family to separate a little and it to have a value.
Moreover, the governments should have spot advertisement on television or by post to motivate an advantage of recycled. In other words, governments should have the policy to increase recycle. In this case, if the family has not a response to recycle from home or not separate the wastes. It obviously that this family would get a ticket. Or would get a warming by post. It would worth for the wastes recycle.
To conclude, I completely think that governments should produce some law about the wastes recycle and reduce people has more responsible of their own. And lets they realize how the worth of recycling and concerning environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irement recycled from home. In begging, some people has not known or response to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73947547861 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482213438735 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0106984842 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.625 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344936439411 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107635175768 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11138158447 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226970030609 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634123499157 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.