Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The problem of waste from homes which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people demanded that it is hazardous while others disagree. However, a small number of individuals feel that the trash from houses which is insufficient for reusing and believe that a legal right is the main to rise way reprocessing which is ensured by governments. In my opinion, laws are an essential for climbing recycle. This essay will elaborate the reasons attributing to this trend in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays a huge number of trashes come from homes which are unable to fill up recycling products. To take an example, many Bangladeshi Individuals are unconcern about recycle objects such as plastic bottles, glass bottles, can, aluminum which are always going into drain and river instead of recycle shop, where it can be made new elements. Therefore, if governments receive some Strick laws to prevent trashes are throwing in water side, it would be assisted to improve recycling sectors.
On the other hand, governments should be carried a few numbers of rights to rise using of recycling products along with giving to trash shops. Besides, all governments should encourage people exchange recycled material through earning money. For instance, an organization of Bangladesh which name is 'Biddanondo' collect all kinds of reusing stuffs from poor people through giving daily needs such as rice, flour, chicken, vegetables. Hence, it is a good idea to recollect waste from houses and develop recycling sector.
To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that them-drawbacks of waste from homes indeed too dire to ignore. However, governments should be supported an essential steps to increase recycling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...zardous while others disagree. However, a small number of individuals feel that the trash from ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27208480565 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76587947599 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2414739229 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270396501758 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920912386593 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447306493942 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152276716552 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427438577471 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.