Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Waste is the most substantial section of human being. Some people assert that waste from household is not ample to be recycled. While i thank that, the government should play vital role in waste collection by introducing strict laws, I also believe that education about recycling is more important.
To begin, it is widely accepted that creating strict rule against waste helps to escalate recycling process. Hence, individual would forced to think before throwing something in public place. Take Singapore as an example, the higher authority of Singapore imparted heavy fine on spoiling places. As a result, people of Singapore diverted their mind towards recycling of dust and achieved the most cleanest city in the world. Secondly, administrator should spread wide range of dustbin network to collect enormous amount of worthless elements. In other words, some places where disposal amenities are not available so that people have to throw wrappers and places are flooded with useless materials.
Furthermore, education about waste solve the vast range of hurdles. Education ministry should involve chapters related waste in curriculum so that student, can gain more value about environment and disposal, led to old people who are indulging in spread of waste. Additionally, Teachers should stimulate students about hygiene condition and make place more fruitful by use of recycle materials.
On the other flank, there are some people hold the notion that enforcement of laws may cause people to resent them and react by sticking even more firmly with way of disposal. However, this situation may be amended by stimulating to people. Therefore, if government hope to make recycling as a common process in household throughout the country, they need to pass laws in parliament.
To conclude, having negative impact of recycling law, positive effect is dominated cons. Public should always support government for betterment of nation in terms of recycling process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...hold is not ample to be recycled. While i thank that, the government should play ...
^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'force'
Suggestion: force
...ycling process. Hence, individual would forced to think before throwing something in p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'cleanest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: cleanest
...ards recycling of dust and achieved the most cleanest city in the world. Secondly, administra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the cleanest'.
Suggestion: most the cleanest
...ards recycling of dust and achieved the most cleanest city in the world. Secondly, administra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ministry should involve chapters related waste in curriculum so that student, can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42207792208 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68461537718 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1826886061 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2352941176 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316741506996 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894056462138 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638474513888 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168377839167 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481419680869 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.