This is a commonly held belief that recycling measures are not enough in our throwaway culture. However, some assert that the government should enact legislation to improve the recycling process. Admittedly, I completely believe laws could be effective in this trend.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that low enforcement is compulsory for all people. Simply put, when a requirement such as helping to recover home wastes becomes a low, violation of enacting it is crime and the offenders are fined and punished. This in turn cause that people tend to enforce laws to save from fines. Take home garbage separation legislation as an example. If there is a law for people to separate their waste into trash bins, they do it as a routine activity to prevent legal punishments. Hence, lows make people participate in enhance reusing their rubbish.
Yet another compelling argument is that the implement recycling process on a large scale needs some infrastructures and facilities. To put it differently, almost laws have especial platforms that are measured and implemented by the government to simplify their enacting for people. A good illustration could be setting Trash bins all over the city if garbage separation was low. This assists people everywhere to put their litter in particular bin. Also In some countries, people who want to buy bottled milk or soda should return their previous bottle to be given a new one. This in turn will be an effective improvement in recovering.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that laws play a crucial role to make people reclaim their waste. This is mainly because people try to be safe from the punishment of law violations
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
- Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good Do you agree or disagree 82
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, in particular, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04844290657 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85144202377 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1452221222 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8235294118 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302849105032 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871069829907 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588815329488 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171729848659 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430436138725 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.