Some people claim that not enough the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Nowadays, there are many people who express concern regarding reusing domestic waste. However, it still is a controversial issue that whether the government should enact a law about recycling in order to make people recycle more their waste or not. In my view, I quite agree with the former opinion for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is obvious that recycling is a common tendency of the world. It is because that it can support people to save money and natural resources as well as protect the environment. To illustrate, a recent research on the Internet has shown that a family has reusing activities can economize at least 15% of monthly housing expenses. Therefore, recycling plays an essential part of every country.
Secondly, legislation is one of the best ways to raise the public's awareness of any issue. To be specific, the intervention of the government will make people pay more attention to recycling so more and more people can recognize the benefits of it.
Moreover, the punishments of laws always have a serious influence on social actions. Therefore, it will make people be proactive to do recycle.
However, enacting law is an important work of every nation so the government should take steps carefully to do this. Besides, they need to spend a necessary period of time in order to help the citizens adapt to the change.
In conclusion, the government should give priority to taking care recycling works because not only it's direct benefit but also the sustainable development of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...protect the environment. To illustrate, a recent research on the Internet has shown that a family...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...on is one of the best ways to raise the publics awareness of any issue. To be specific,...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...Besides, they need to spend a necessary period of time in order to help the citizens adapt to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, at least, in conclusion, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06324110672 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79317187452 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0385899145 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313486013767 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900469169136 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845785842166 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144107315805 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736430152335 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.