It is considered by many people that the amount of recycling in homes is not efficient, so in order to raise recycling, there should be some laws which are put by the government. I totally agree with this opinion, because for taking attention to awareness of environmental pollution it could be a significant sanction.
Nowadays, using harmful materials is an important issue that should be considered. In increase to use packed products became to a very common thing owing to particularly ready-made foods and with this rising, people started to take out their wastes without thinking about that would bring a number of damages to nature. Most of the packages of products are made by some kind of polymers and if these materials do not turn back to the raw state, probably they would not disappear in nature even though takes a long time. To solve this issue, waste of homes or every kind of buildings such as workplaces should distinguish the rubbishes for providing a cleaner planet. However, emphasizing this environmental consciousness is not an easy thing thereby, there should be strict rules for people. For instance, if people do not separate their waste, there would be monetary punishments and if they maintain that behavior, the authorities would detect them and they would point out some public tasks to these people.
On the other hand, being aware of the importance of recycling, governments could some precautions in schools. The programme of curriculum could be organized by teachers guide to show the children how they can be eco-friendly individuals. Protecting nature with more recycling should be taught at an early age to make the basis of this topic.
In conclusion, without any arrangements such as laws and education, people probably will not take care of replacing wastes to provide raw materials, hence the government should play a significant role in emphasizing it to society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is considered by many people that the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it could be a significant sanction. Nowadays, using harmful materials is an ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some public tasks to these people. On the other hand, being aware of the im...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age to make the basis of this topic. In conclusion, without any arrangements ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11146496815 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86970244051 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6383555771 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197741437428 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687977111487 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486270821499 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112909504961 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022369834102 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.