with the explosion in population and subsequent increase in producing waste in houses in metropolises, the subject of recycling is becoming the hottest dispute in human societies. meanwhile, some say the volume of waste that is recycled is not enough and a new rule should be passed to force people to recycle their unwanted objects. but whether these laws can be beneficial or not?
as before the mentioned, a fraction of citizens in big cities like London, Paris and Tehran severely believe that for rising recycling, it is vital and essential that there are some rules to force people to do it. however, the operationalization of these laws faced with some problems. certainly, the first problem is its expense. according to the latest research is conducted at the University of Tehran, the expense of operating a new rule is three or four times bigger than the value of the whole recyclable objects that are consumed in during a 5-year-old period in the capital of Iran with approximately 14 million population.
besides, the amount of waste that is produced in one special apartment or house is not recognizable and predictable. Therefore, it is practically impossible to determine who implement the rules and also how the volume of the recyclable waste is returned to the production cycle by people.
in my point of view, the most logical solution for this phenomenon is prevailing the culture of recycling among people to do it voluntarily, not with compulsory.
overall, it can be concluded that the rationale behind the legalization of recycling with the notice of its expense and unidentifiable people who are involved in this law, is not applicable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
with the explosion in population and subsequ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...the hottest dispute in human societies. meanwhile, some say the volume of waste that is r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ople to recycle their unwanted objects. but whether these laws can be beneficial or...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...r these laws can be beneficial or not? as before the mentioned, a fraction of cit...
^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certainly
...of these laws faced with some problems. certainly, the first problem is its expense. acco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...inly, the first problem is its expense. according to the latest research is conducted at ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...h approximately 14 million population. besides, the amount of waste that is produced i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ned to the production cycle by people. in my point of view, the most logical solu...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...o it voluntarily, not with compulsory. overall, it can be concluded that the rationale...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06181818182 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02042851757 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9361772402 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236891932103 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836102324677 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067498484387 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130441036635 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055668674073 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.