Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
According to some people by using computers, people can see historical objects and art work through them without physically going to art galleries or museums. I totally disagree to this statement as I feel that the experience one get by visiting theses places is completely different from seeing them on a screen and moreover, spending some time at theses places, is the only method to understand the value and importance of such precious objects.
The experience gained by visiting places personally such as museums and art exhibitions is a complete out of world experience. Youngsters and students will learn a great deal of knowledge about history and art which cannot be appreciated on a computer monitor as it is devoid of the beautiful surroundings of those exhibits. Additionally, computer screens create fatigue to eyes and cannot represent the same data that a local guide can give.
Spending time with precious objects is a wonder option that is not available over the internet or web-based viewing of a the place. For example, when we see a fossil or a skeleton of an unknown animal from the past we instantaneously recognize its value and importance. Whereas, the same material presented to us in a photograph produces less impact. Therefore, it imperative to have a close look of such objects to understand them.
To sum up, I feel places like art exhibitions and museums needed to be seen with our own eyes and not visualizing it's listed of contents on a computer in the form of photographs or videos because personal visits give us wonderful experience and time spent there is useful in understanding them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...er the internet or web-based viewing of a the place. For example, when we see a fossi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, i feel, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99632352941 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93707204421 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6091592019 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.9 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271733475944 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924632200209 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115830725417 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150411524249 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910927434178 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.