There are different agreements between some people and others in whether raising animals in captivity or keeping them in natural habitat is a better option. This has been continuing to be a topical debate and there are valid opinions on both sides, which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, there are question marks over the naturalistic of animal zoos, as wild animals are being kept in autonomous cages with restrictively artificial habitat. "Animal parks" can be detrimental to their borned instict in hunting and raising offsprings. This has been shown in the current inabilty of wild animals in giving birth of various parks. In addition, some people argue that keeping animals in captivity is a strenious work, as it requires a tremendous running cost in both human resources and research development. After all, there is a concern over the humanity of manipulating animal's rights for people's own benefits.
On the other hand, the impending forest loss nowadays somehow affects the natural habitat, and thus gradually enduce the declination in number of wildlife animals. With high technology, scientists and research developer can stimulate natural-like habitat which helps animal to give birth even in specific conditions. Moreover, the notion of captive animals is beneficial to the scientific purpose, as the extraction of specific genes is to probe various methods in order to cure anomaly diseases in the future. Therefore, animals in zoos are being protected while the natural endangered species are facing with many difficulties which may harm their lives.
In conclusion, my own opinion is that animals should be released into the wild. The advantages are noticebly, however do not outweight the possibly disadvantages. When animal's rights are not being properly maintained, an abuse of animals deliberately lead to the vanish in their natural behaviour in wildlife.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n abuse of animals deliberately lead to the vanish in their natural behaviour in wildlife....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38590604027 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87163829071 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8637586384 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244934572724 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824862113894 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569108280704 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148113445122 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750401048925 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.