Some people that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays there is an opinion that governments should make a law that will require people to recycle. This opinion has appeared due to a low proportion of recycling compare with existing rubbish.
it is clear that recycling depends on people mind and their personalities that have been being formed during their life. Solving the problem has to base on this statement. It eventually can lead to make requirements. Because if people have an obligation, they will be changing their mind. If one generation has been changed, it will impact on future generations. For instance, the government in Russia is fighting with smoking and as part of this fighting the government has restricted places where people can smoke. This decision is affecting humans and leading to more healthy new generation.
On the other hand, it is crucial to notice that this type of solving the problem is radical and must be used at the last time. Despite the effect of this solution, there are lots of other ways of solving the problem. It is more important to explain to people the benefits of using recycling and integrate this explanation into school education. For example, there was an experiment that took place at a Kazan school. Teachers had to explain why smoking is bad for the humanity. Results of this experiment are an unbelievable success. Most students who graduated this school do not smoke.
To conclude, it is important to emphasize that making the obligations is really effective, but it is radical at the same time. People should find a softer solution, because of the main reason of the problem is people consciousness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ling compare with existing rubbish. it is clear that recycling depends on peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, as to, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9852398524 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7537665253 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1648345669 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0555555556 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193577951801 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586320972303 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515969225499 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125616558752 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365714615087 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.