Some people point out that there will be less international travel in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?
Since the World War II finished, the Earth becomes peaceful again and thus the number of international travels increases rapidly every year. It is because of the needs of worldwide tourists to gain more knowledge of the other countries as well as to enjoy the wonderful sceneries of all continents after the tragedy war had come to an end. However, with the evolvement of technology, especially the Internet, people predict that there will be less cross-country travel due to the fact that they tend to sit in front of the screen and watch the world through the programs shown, instead of buying a ticket and fly directly to the destination. In my opinion, this is clearly a negative trend, which affects the society badly on many perspectives.
To the tourists, traveling through the screen definitely cannot give them the most interesting feelings. Researches show that real-world tours still have their own valuable attractiveness. People enjoy watching, tasting, touching and feeling with their real sense, not by imagining things shown on TV, Internet, or any dry essay. Real tours will give them memorable memories, which they cannot have when seeing sceneries on the media flash before their eyes. This passive way of traveling also bring them to many health risks. Physically, they will be threatened by obesity and heart diseases since they are not moving. Mentally, people become lazier, and thus feeling stressful and depressed.
To the countries, less international travel in the future means less income. Many countries depend on this non-smoking industry profits to develop. If this happens, their doors to the economic development will be closed. Moreover, when there are fewer cross-country tours, the job opportunities for local people will decrease. In some regions, the inhabitants are mostly illiterate and the only way for them to survive is to make money from tourism jobs. Without it, they will easily fall into poverty and maybe even crimes, which are dangerous to the countries’ security.
Some people support the opposite side of the problem. They point out that less international travels, in other words, more screen-traveling, give people another approach to various cultures with less money to spend. To restate, this method does harm to both people and the countries, as shown above. Some argue that cutting down non-essential travelling can save the planet as there will be less oil, gas and petrol be used. In the meanwhile, this might be true, but scientists are making efforts to invent more and more eco-friendly fuel to reduce the pollution. Preventing travelling by means of transports then also prevents people from exploring the world and widen their knowledge. Accordingly, this somehow slows down the development progress of the community.
In a word, there should not be less international travel in the future since it will lead to many problems to individuals and also the countries. Governments should initiate more policies to impulse the development of this essential industry to bring benefits for both their citizens and the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-23 | trang2112 | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | saklovesyao | 73 | view |
- Some people point out that there will be less international travel in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative trend? 73
- Some people think museums should be enjoyable places to attract and entertain young people. Others think the purpose of museums is to educate, not to entertain. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 84
- The graphs below compare the number cosmetic procedures performed on males and females in Korea in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Forest produces fresh oxygen and participates in regulating climate But every year trees cover of our planet is lessening due to deforestation What are the primary causes of deforestation What result may it lead to 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 496.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23790322581 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82074825314 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54435483871 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.233360753 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26935508877 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698338527628 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639104988509 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151940399453 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550362285627 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.