Some people prefer to a live in house, while others feel that there are more advantages to live in apartment.
Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house comparing with living in an apartment?
It is important for people to consider which type of accommodation they should live in. While some believe that it is better to live in a house, others feel that living in a flat offers more benefits. This essay will explain why I believe the drawbacks of living in a house are outweighed by the positives when compared to life in an apartment.
Considering firstly the negatives of houses, an important one is that this type of accommodation tends to be less secure. This is because the vast majority of houses are only protected by a single or double on the front door, with occasionally a rarely-used burglar alarm inside. Furthermore, houses are usually only one or two, storeys high, which is low enough for a burglar to see through and enter via a window. Contrast this with apartment blocks, which are frequently equipped with surveillance camera, security guards and other forms of criminal deterrence.
However, the main advantages of living in a house are that they are often more spacious and more private. With regard to the former, houses typically have multiple rooms to allow plenty of space for leisure and relaxation, which is especially needful for families with children. As for the latter, at least in the case of detached house, greater privacy is possible because noise does not carry through one wall and into the neighboring residence. Conversely, not only are flats generally smaller, but they are also less private due to neighbors living in very close proximity.
In conclusion, I think that the advantages of space and privacy that come with living in a house outweigh the disadvantages of less security in comparison with living in an apartment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...private due to neighbors living in very close proximity. In conclusion, I think that the advan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as for, at least, i think, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76668475617 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8547821548 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416818267407 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154691060114 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150299762876 0.0667982634062 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279997734421 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146441464368 0.056905535591 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.