The working environment is different for differ rent organisations. Even two large companies or two small companies have absolutely varied work culture, but in general terms we can make a difference in large and small companies with some parameter. I have experience working with large and small firms and based on my experience I personally prefer to work with a small organisations due to several reasons which I’ll explain in following essay.
Firstly, It is important to have some extent of freedom in work culture. IF an individual wants to propose an opinion or idea for certain work, he should get an opportunity to project his thoughts. This is required to keep work force motivated. For example, when I was in large company, we were working on an improvement project. We had a big team with a leader ( my immidiate boss) who gave all updates to higher management. During project, I and my teammates came up with an idea to do things in better way, but somehow my leader couldn’t get convinced. Also due to gap in management levels, we were unable to propose this idea to anyone else. The experience was disappointing and dragged out the enthusiasum towards work from most of my collegues.
Secondly, Small firms have few peoples working in a office. So everyone almost knows every other person working. Most of the bosses even know who is peon in the office. This helps bosses recognise the good performer in a team. One can’t take false credit for other persons work. In my personal experience, I’m a shy person and don’t like to talk much about my work or credits. When I was in a large company, I had a hard time to communicate to top bosses about my achievements. Even for some instances ,my senior took credit for my work. The large companies generally have many layers of hierarche so to reach to bosses or the people who are actual decision makers is very difficult. On the other hand, in small firms, my boss worked in close proximity. He had complete information of work performed by every individual. So without mentioning much about my work, I always got good incentives and appreciation for my work.
In conclusion, small companies can offer an individual freedom for work and proper recognition for work which holds employees interests in work and gives him satisfaction of work. Due to all these reasons I will prefer to work with small firms
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...project. We had a big team with a leader my immidiate boss who gave all updates t...
^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... my leader couldn't get convinced. Also due to gap in management levels, we wer...
^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Small firms have few peoples working in a office. So everyone almost knows every ...
^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...my achievements. Even for some instances ,my senior took credit for my work. The l...
^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...hand, in small firms, my boss worked in close proximity. He had complete information of work p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'individual freedom'.
Suggestion: individual freedom
...n conclusion, small companies can offer an individual freedom for work and proper recognition for wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84634146341 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81428433384 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514634146341 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9269891793 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.48 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324378671702 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981803226123 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778509867912 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230193372111 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734859233759 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.