Many people, and children in particular, spent times on playing video games. While I accept that these games have a positive effect on the users, i believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.
On the one hand, video games can bring people both entertainment and education. At first, playing games is a perfect way to reduce stress, which caused by work and study pressure. Secondly, people not only can relax while playing games but also can improve personal skills. For example, when people have leisure time, instead of accessing some nonsense games, they can enjoy educational games such as puzzle, finding differences, tactics, etc. Although these games were quite familiar with the vast majority people, less of them knew they were constructed to elevate brain of usage.
However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Some people were addicted in playing games because they want to feel the process of obtaining high core. As a result, people gradually leave real-life and dive into fictional world. Furthermore, it is effortless to catch eye disease if people spend just approximately three hours per day interact with electrical devices. My brother, for instance, has been nearsighted when he was eight because of wasting too much time on useless computer games. The rise in myopic disease in recent years has also been linked to overuse eyes.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...es have a positive effect on the users, i believe that they are more likely to ha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54005984181 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7139303461 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317121095961 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999951619588 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065150148563 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184116543924 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552037272238 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.