Some people say that all mobile/cell phone conversations should be banned in public and crowded places. Others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
With the advancement of technology, almost everyone owns smartphones these days. While some feel that conversing through them in community areas should be restricted, I side with those who believe that it is impossible having taken into account emergencies and the implementation of such policy.
On the one hand, supporters of introducing a ban on public-made phone calls might argue that they are a serious source of distraction and annoyance. Take a theater for example. As a result of a person answering their phone, not only do the audience feel annoyed, but also do the performers because it may take their attention away. In addition to this, it is not uncommon to see some people using abusive language during conversations, which is inappropriate in public places, such as parks. Young children might negatively be influenced consequently. Therefore, there seems to be a point in this prohibition.
Despite the argumentation above, I support those who think there are two main reasons why restricting phone calls does not work. Firstly, some phone calls require an urgent reaction: emergencies. Under such circumstances, ignoring a call is not the right course of action because a person’s life may be saved through a single call to an ambulance, for instance. Secondly, putting this suggestion into practice will not be possible unless an intelligent enough jamming machine is invented to sort out which calls, both incoming and outgoing, are urgent and immediate. I do understand that these calls are a cause of annoyance, but banning them altogether is wrong and unfeasible.
In conclusion, although some people argue that cell phone calls should be limited in crowded places, I agree with those who believe that it is not workable as difficulties of putting it into practice are insurmountable.
Comments
Teachers now demand a lot…
Teachers now demand a lot from students, a lot needs to be learned and memorized, but I cope with this with ease, since there is this site https://expert-writers.net/, on it they do written work for me, such as essays, and I do not spend time on them, but I'm going for a walk with my friends, who, by the way, also sit on it
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25085910653 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0506678095 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6223253144 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189988689504 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580540560656 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446992398583 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121379314862 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362909256018 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.