Even though it is contested by many stating that the rise in sports facilities helps in revamping of public health, such issue is regarded thoroughly in both constructive and positive ways by a substantial number of individuals. In this essay, I will delve into both the arguments and will provide my opinion.
First of all, considering the solution of increasing the count of amenities really help? I guess it will not until the public start to take advantage of the resources. The utilization of facilities completely depends on several factors of an individual like the attitude or interest towards the sport or even the financial support. For instance, consider my brother who is incapable to schedule workout in his timeline; when he started to plow through the schedule, he finds sufficient time. This happens purely due to laziness and the attitude of procrastinating things. But with almost the same schedule, my sister works on several other things and projects her interest through artwork.
On the contrary, the current generation is engulfed with psychic stress. To support it, they hypothesize saying that they are in lack of time due to their necessity at work. All they are experiencing an imbalance in work-life balance, as well as facing physical and mental stress. Additionally, they are feeding on fast food. Although it comes with comfort and convenience, they come with aftereffects like obesity, diabetes and so on. This can be endorsed by research conducted in comparison of countryside lifestyle with city life by Osmania Medical University, India which stated that the population in the countryside are leading 72% better and healthy lifestyle. It is a known fact that there are fewer facilities in the countryside when compared to a developing city.
Personally, in my opinion, I believe that the balance on lifestyle keeps an individual healthy. Even though we are flooded with a number of sports facilities and fitness centers, it is the will power that guide to keep us in a good shape. Alternatively, the government needs to increase awareness campaigns to educate the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, well, for instance, i guess, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1749271137 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94350641926 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600583090379 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5310103638 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6111111111 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114598339263 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315944681371 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040470284877 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764528924427 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497087448505 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.