Some people say that the development of genetic engineering in agriculture is necessary in the modern time. What's your opinion?
Farming methods utilizing genetic change should be encouraged for widespread use among farmers because of their obvious benefits. To begin with, gm technology enhance the endurance and resistance in crops. Not only can gm crops resist to diseases and insects but they are also able to withstand weather extremes and fluctuations. Therefore, the consumption of synthetic chemical substances is limited which means that crops produced are much healthier and more environmentally friendly, compared to the conventional technique's produce. Transgenic plants have been proved to be more nutritious than the traditional ones. To be specific, that GMOs have been engineered to become more nutrient-rich in terms of vitamin and mineral content has helped people get sufficient nutrients. Moreover, this kind of cultivation method also plays a significant role in fighting against malnutrition in third-world countries thanks to the nutritional value it bring about. Opponents of genetic alteration technology may argue that the complicated, costly manufacturing process and lengthy shipping route of it will raise economic concerns, especially in small countries. While that may be the case, it is irrefutable that genetically modified crops are so strong that they can produce crop yields despite marginal conditions. The higher the productivity is, the more profit the farmers make; hence, contributing to the development of that country's agriculture and economy. To sum up, genetic modification is advantageous; thus, should be widely employed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | jennjenn2107 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 946, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...ries thanks to the nutritional value it bring about. Opponents of genetic alteration ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ponents of genetic alteration technology may argue that the complicated, costly m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, third, thus, while, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75438596491 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14436673542 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.697368421053 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5961936317 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800379228155 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272369406778 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288882808747 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800379228155 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.