Some people say that drug companies have the responsibility to spend money on researching medicine to help the poorer countries, while others think the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the dearth of medical care, people living in the deprived countries are vulnerable to disease — even easily-curable diseases may incur a great danger to their health. The debate about whether drug companies should give support to those countries by investing on researching new medicine never seems to end.
Some people are strong advocates of delivering maximum profit to their investor is the main responsibility of drug companies. Like any other companies, drug companies are profit-oriented organizations that are built to earn money. Research on new medicine usually requires long-term inputs, including people resource and enormous funds, which lead to high costs. If drug companies were forced to put money on such researching continuously and unconditionally, many of them would be unlikely to balance their payments, especially those small-scale ones with strong dependance on their markets, and they would finally end up with bankruptcy and consequently bring about unemployment and even the shortage of some drugs. Therefore it is unfair for those companies.
However, some opponents argue that drug companies are the most appropriate candidates who should stand on the stage to aid the poor people. This is because drug companies have the ability to do such profound research, they can take out a reasonable proportion from their profit to invest in meaningful attempts. And if they succeed to provide effective and affordable drugs to the poor countries, they would get a global reputation. Furthermore, the benefited countries can also back up those companies in various ways, including providing workforce and raw materials. That would become a win-win result.
In my opinion, drug companies, especially those big international corporations, should look at the longer run, keeping investing on new medicine researching to help the undeveloped countries is not only making contribution to the human society but also improving their own prospects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esearch on new medicine usually requires long-term inputs, including people resou...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding people resource and enormous funds, which lead to high costs. If drug compan...
^^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on their markets, and they would finally end up with bankruptcy and consequently ...
^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nt and even the shortage of some drugs. Therefore it is unfair for those companies. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ways, including providing workforce and raw materials. That would become a win-w...
^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly those big international corporations, should look at the longer run, keeping i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56622516556 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05332668157 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.2000512062 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.307692308 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28348754041 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936335430769 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657650606423 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15529490234 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480645974866 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.