Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped.
Discuss both the use views and give your opinion.
Economic development is the priority of many countries around the world. While there are concerns about the detrimental impacts of this growth on the environment and calling for a halt to this process, I believe economic expansion is the only solution to impoverishment and starvation.
To begin with, the environment has suffered tremendously from economic activities. Firstly, the process of industrialization, which is a part of the economic progress is fueled by fossil resources like coal or oil. The resulting consequence from burning those fuels is degrading air quality and the growing number of climate change-induced disasters due to a high level of exhaust fumes and co2 emissions into the air. Moreover, a vast area of woodland has been wiped out to make place for agricultural practices or the construction of infrastructure serving industrial or tourism purposes. Therefore, various species are driven to extinction because of the deprival of their natural habitat, posing a threat to biodiversity.
However, economic growth has also lifted many countries out of poverty and hunger. A contributing factor is that developing the economy requires joint efforts from people with differing skills and expertise levels. Therefore, every class of society is given job opportunities, ranging from manual to office ones, along with a stable income to make ends meet and even improve their living standard. In addition, with strong financial backup following a developed economy, the government can address the shortage of food more effectively. To demonstrate, Japan is a developed country with a harsh geographical condition for agriculture. However, this country has enough budget to allocate on technological advancement in cultivation and import food from other countries, thus ensuring food security for its citizens
In conclusion, though economic growth is the underlying cause for air pollution and the loss of biodiversity, its effectiveness in alleviating poverty and hunger is irrefutable. Therefore, I believe the authorities should take steps to mitigate the undesirable side-effects of this expansion and continue the development of the economy
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64024390244 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2541043959 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1764478932 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145816274212 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511784661541 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062554260544 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973288004385 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422542569858 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.