Many individuals believe that only economic growth can bring deprivation and starvation to an end, whereas some argue that it should be stopped because the environment is being destroyed. From my perspective, I am in agreement with the former view, even though the latter one is reasonable.
There is a common belief that the environment can be destroyed by economic development. In fact, people are surrounded by industries in which natural resources are dramatically exploited and utilized. The areas, such as wood processing, are over-exploiting natural forests, so that has adverse effects on not only creatures living dependently on the woods but also the whole atmosphere and environment. On top of that, economic growth obviously causes severe air pollution, along with the expansion of factories, industrial zones, and the growing number of personal vehicles. It is immutably true that industrial activities negatively impact the environment, ozone layers, and ecosystems by contributing carbon dioxide gas. However, economic development can be helpful in overcoming the problems. For instance, the government budget can be invested in innovations invented for purifying the air and using renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power.
It is undeniable that economic development can help people suffering from starvation and other unprivileged situations. The first reason is that people can find jobs to meet their basic needs.For example, when an international corporation penetrates into a developing country, citizens of the nation can get a job and a salary to maintain their daily life. As a result, their living standards, in particular, and the development of the whole country, in general, can significantly increase. Moreover, economic growth can also build public awareness. In Vietnam, many big companies raised funds and established schools in mountainous areas in the north for charitable purposes. Consequently, the number of illiterate people in those areas was magnificently reinforced. Also, the poor customs and criminal rate improved considerably.
To sum up, many people hold their own point of view about the effects of economic growth on poverty, hunger, and the environment. However, I believe that economic development plays a vital role in bringing deprivation to an end and maintaining nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...can find jobs to meet their basic needs.For example, when an international corporat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58988764045 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15866758484 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60393258427 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3345070277 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222438034771 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703367869354 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715218036112 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154495182752 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051532600297 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.