Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily? Do you agree or disagree?
It argued that the government should increase air tax in order to reduce traffic in the sky. This essay disagrees with this statement because planes are more environment-friendlier then other transport and high tax will affect lower-class people.
It is undoubtedly true that aircraft is more environment-friendlier than other vehicles. There are a variety of pollutions, for instance, traffic from buses, cars, and trains should be the primary concern. If the state will encourage us to pay more tax for air trips, then many of them will use ground transportation, which will lead to destroying the ecology of the earth. A recent study finds that 30% of carbon dioxide is produced by street vehicles.
It is certainly true that, if the travel expenses for flights will not be cheap, it will affect the low-segment class. Because of that, people will lose their time for overseas visits which can take several days to get to the final destination. Otherwise, people with a low income will spend more on travelling, rather than buying important things which are more important for their well-being. Research shows that people selecting low-carriers such as BlueJat and Pobeda in order to cut their expenses and to consume important things that can be useful in their lives.
Taking all these points into consideration, making the tax higher than now has financial drawbacks for poorer families and also this decision will be a reason for the dirty nature caused by non-ecological ground vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igh tax will affect lower-class people. It is undoubtedly true that aircraft is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings that can be useful in their lives. Taking all these points into considerati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19262295082 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03365904606 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.903636 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.181818182 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154089387663 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692539172648 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839942735327 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106568921184 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830904528923 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.