Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In the modern world environmental issues have attracted more attention than ever before. Consequently, this has raised a controversial question whether a country has the ability to achieve either commercial goals or biological progress. Some people believe that this requirement is unattainable, however, as far as I am concerned, by activating an appropriate protocol, success in two inconsistent aspects undoubtedly exists.
There are several conspicuous reasons for people to support their view. There is an ubiquitous belief that to gain economic development, a huge amount of material is definitely necessary, especially which can only be found by exploitation and deforestation. This is primarily because the driving force behind the success of a developing country is the heavy industry; hence, it imposes a massive burden on the ecosystem. Moreover, they often argue that national business would suffer were environmental goals to be prioritised since carbon emission causing acid deposition needs depleting. In fact, it has been a prevalence for industrializing nations to generate electricity using coal. By doing this, energy deficiency will prevent production and trading patterns.
On the contrary, I commit that achieving both economic and environmental advancement is possible with ideal methods. Apparently, environmentally friendly sources of energy contribute substantially to this success as they require less expenditure and do not release any carbon dioxide. These are renewable energy such as solar, wind, tidal and thermal power which are unlimited to access and affordable for installation and adaptation. In addition to this, a country can seek for international help or learn from the initiation of other nations. Therefore, adequate knowledge, up-to-date techniques and technologies will be provided with dedicated and responsible foreign consultancies. The partnership between Vietnam and Japan is often cited as an example since Japanese authority has launched several conservation projects in Vietnam by using nanotechnology and microbial procedures.
To put it simply, notwithstanding conflicting arguments among people, I am wholeheartedly determined that achieving both economic and environmental progression is not beyond imagination for individual entities in the world. I would recommend that governments should tackle these contradictory aspects equally to conciliate them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion whether a country has the ability to achieve either commercial goals or biolo...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... people to support their view. There is an ubiquitous belief that to gain economic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00578034682 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39731002311 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9408221105 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.235294118 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185498312476 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504171793213 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432811741968 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099675616232 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171838379932 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.