Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The 21st century has witnessed tremendous advances in technology more than ever in the past. While experiencing varieties of high-tech services, people become to prefer shopping with modernized methods whereas there is also the opposition view. In this essay, both perspectives will be analyzed, followed by my personal preference.
Indeed, there is no doubt that contemporary technological service has transformed shopping to be more convenient. Especially the saving in time to commute has been a great surplus to those who found the traditional shopping exhausting. The fingers will do the walk on the screen while the customer just needs to wait for the delivery of the product. Regardless of your physical well-being whether you are in your bed relaxing or your legs being injured, the high-tech nowadays eased the struggle to go grocery shopping in marts as you can buy the products online. Significantly which is different from traditional shopping would be closer contact between the producers and the customers. The consumers can immediately ring up or send the main office for complaints without needing to report first to the third parties like in our past decades. In addition, modern technology has indirectly lessened the exposure to diseases caused by cash money.
Relating to the opposing view, it is claimed that shopping is regarded as a past-time activity where families or friends enjoy time together. Accompanied by less practical shopping at marts, people will sooner or later be less socialized and prone to mental disorders since sometimes health al soul is nurtured by the surrounding environment. Aside from this emotional impact, the satisfaction after purchasing online or in-person differs, too. Online shopping is notorious for getting things with the least expected quality since we cannot ensure the quality of the product just by seeing the provided pictures online. Ironically, there are fewer chances to ask for a refund or alternatives when a low-quality product is purchased.
In conclusion, the high-tech devices have made shopping to be more customer-friendly, yet there are Imany loopholes to tackle as the opposing view has pointed out. As an individual who loves window shopping, I will be siding with the agreement part only if online shopping has no prominent technical flaws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | hahahahahah | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, third, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37158469945 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95195282837 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7704136312 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.647058824 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169028479799 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497509014525 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408262662317 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105049099105 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374229941878 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, third, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37158469945 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95195282837 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7704136312 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.647058824 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169028479799 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497509014525 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408262662317 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105049099105 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374229941878 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.