Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust. Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony. Which approach do you consider to be better in relationships and why?
The type of relationships we have with a partner, friends, parents, children, relatives, office-colleagues and neighbors are all different. Honesty and trust, however, are the key elements for long-term relationships in almost all areas of life. In my opinion, without these qualities, a relationship can only be based on mistrust and suspicion. This essay will discuss the appropriate mental attitude to encourage and sustain the long-lasting relationship.
Development of trust occurs gradually throughout a relationship, yet destruction of trust can be easily possible by dishonest attitude. For example, if a person lies to someone, it is probable that the other person will eventually realize they have been deceived and as a result, they will be less likely to trust that person in the future. On the contrary, relationships in which people are honest with one another are likely to remain strong and healthy.
Being honest, on the other hand, does not mean people should always say what they know, think or feel. It is, for instance, sometimes better to say nothing than to say something that might hurt another person’s feelings. Also, some people believe that in certain social situations it is better to be dishonest in order to avoid embarrassing another person and to maintain harmony. However, although this hides conflict in the short term, this conflict still exists and may be expressed in a destructive way at a later stage. A Recent survey conducted by Oxford University concluded that disloyalty is the key factor accountable to spoil relations.
In conclusion, because harmonious relationships are important, people must find ways to live with others and to deal with the conflicts that are an unavoidable part of life. Deception is only a short-term solution that will eventually destroy any type of relationship. It is predicted that long-standing associations could be established by righteousness and morality in character.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...flict still exists and may be expressed in a destructive way at a later stage. A Recent survey condu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actor accountable to spoil relations. In conclusion, because harmonious relati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39739413681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16536967736 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5860327407 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36894786097 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109748959208 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757426879033 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200759851378 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509396662734 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.