Nowadays, having a successful connection with a partner is being so complex and also related to several fundamental criteria in order to be glad such as loyalty, not telling a lie as well as spending time with each other. From my point of view, both argument has validity, but personally i lean towards the first one.
Some would argue that relationship encompasses various range of conditions such as a useful interaction and also having a strong emotional feeling between both side of connection in order to be satisfied as well as accomplish peace or the sake of partner. Either men or women have a principal role throughout the relationship. Indeed, having a same perception a definition of relationship leads both side to increased the achievement of whatever they want.
On the other side, some people have another reflection. indeed, mixture of both good and bad attributes give rise to relationship being satisfied. In addition, being a cheater or the one who not tells a truth would have a good impact on a relationship. From where i stand, this idea prone to a destructive consequence for instance it causes on or two side of connection to be pessimistic and also lack of trust will be conspicuous
later on. Granted, being dishonest leads relationship to diminish a friendship among two parts and also puts a strain on keeping it for a long time.
Overall, if someone considers relationship to a successful one, he or she has to avoid vital mistakes which may expose relationship to a dangerous circumstances and push himself or herself so hard to do everything in order to please their partner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...h argument has validity, but personally i lean towards the first one. Some wou...
^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... of connection in order to be satisfied as well as accomplish peace or the sake of partner...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Indeed
...e, some people have another reflection. indeed, mixture of both good and bad attribute...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...od impact on a relationship. From where i stand, this idea prone to a destructive...
^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d also lack of trust will be conspicuous later on. Granted, being dishonest leads...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94485294118 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04011663393 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3380029312 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292987505466 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110021844466 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476386978071 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157381452943 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485844328009 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.