Some people say that schools should spend more money on computers, others say that more money should be spent on teachers' wages.
Now-a-day universe is getting digitalised. The computer is getting evolved in every area of life. That's why, many people believe that school's primary focus should be computers and use of technology. While educational institutes have limited budget. They should not waste it on the competency of teachers. Many people oppose this idea. I personally believe, that schools should invest on to gain more positive outcomes.
On the One hand, computer literacy will be a necessary skill in daily life of the coming days. A person with a computer, have an unlimited variety of knowledge in his hand. In the current era, a plethora of computer applications is available to students, which provide a great mechanism for learning. A toddlers can find a mentor on the internet who will teach according to students' perception, while, in the classroom they do have limited choice. At the end students will learn more and able to be competent in the near future.
On the other hand, the provision of knowledge and making able to perform well is not only the duty to educational institutes. A number of other responsibilities make the physical presence of a competent guide important. Firstly, brainstorming is an important skill to learn; which can be gained only by a creative social environment produced by a technically supervised personality. Secondly, many students require motivation to gain a leading role in upcoming life, which is only possible by a motivator. It is a fact that technology leading people into isolation. Therefore investment in having a good teacher is better idea.
All in all, consumption of budget on technology is also beneficial, but investing in teachers produces a greater number of benefits. So the primary focus of education system should be the, preserving more budget for the capabilities of faculty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... getting evolved in every area of life. Thats why, many people believe that schools p...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld be computers and use of technology. While educational institutes have limited bud...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the One hand, computer literacy will be a necessary skill in daily life of the c...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A toddler' or simply 'toddlers'?
Suggestion: A toddler; Toddlers
...provide a great mechanism for learning. A toddlers can find a mentor on the internet who w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...chnology leading people into isolation. Therefore investment in having a good teacher is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...ary focus of education system should be the, preserving more budget for the capabili...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17171717172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00945691706 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4854765626 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.85 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197904641025 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561995713581 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609780636347 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121330998831 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679139860115 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.