Some people say that to solve today’s global program every nation should have a good relationship with other nations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What do you think about cooperation and communication between countries?
Some individuals opine that the establishment of a close-knit affiliation among different countries throughout the world can address contemporary universal problems. I do agree with this notion, and collaboration and communication among nations are the key elements to achieve the aforementioned target.
It is undeniable that global issues can be tackled if there is a concrete relationship among nations worldwide. Firstly, there are many global troubles going beyond the capacity of each individual nation, which requires the unification of many governments to together fight against them. Take the global crisis of climate change as an example. In order to wholly solve such problem, in 1997, 192 out of 195 parties signed the Kyoto Protocol – an international treaty, to commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by themselves. Secondly, countries having a harmonious relationship with each other can minimize their chances of involving in unwanted wars and conflicts. By doing this, they can ultimately contribute to building and sustaining a peaceful world.
There are two main reasons to explain that the actions of cooperating and communicating are the fundamental elements to achieve a close partnership among countries. It starts with the fact that communication is always the earliest stage of any relationship. Many nations can organize international summits or government visits to profoundly understand each other’s problems and inclinations. This can pave the way for their sustainable partnerships that are based on mutual understanding. Furthermore, cooperation is the signal of a healthy relationship between countries. For instance, with the immigration crisis of refugees flooding to EU countries, instead of sealing the border some governments decided to cooperate with host nations to aid their citizens and confirm burden-sharing arrangements among them.
In conclusion, I would argue that different countries need to establish a correlation to together tackle the global issues, and in order to accomplish such purpose, they should remember that communication and cooperation are the two decisive components.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some individuals opine that the establis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achieve the aforementioned target. It is undeniable that global issues can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g and sustaining a peaceful world. There are two main reasons to explain th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81388012618 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32816690712 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9128602626 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.866666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208092317208 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068027783888 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393608627372 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121673415928 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01779336758 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.