It is irrefutable that nowadays people are more concerned and possessive for the wild animals. However, it is considered by many that too much attention and several resources are used for the security of the wild animals. I firmly agree with this statement, citizens are more conscious about animals as compare to the other aspects.
In the recent past, many people are more aware about protection of the wild animals and therefore, several campaigns are organised for the welfare of such creatures. For instance, as per the recent survey conducted by the government of England, almost 100 campaigns came into existence in a single year in order to protect the wild beast and for making them survive. In addition, citizens these days make wild animals as their own pets whomsoever animals can be and take them home.
Secondly, most of the wealth of the country are used for the survival and for the protection of the wild animals. Moreover, to make the wild beast comfortable and free, zoos are necessary and thus, construction of zoos requires a lot of funds. Additionally, many individual are fond of watching wild animals closely, which is possible only in the zoo and hence, maintenance of such zoo is also the part of the additional expense. For example, almost, 26% of wild animals are living in the zoos in Australia, which is quite high and thus, the natural habitats of such animals needs more findings.
To conclude, although it is necessary to protect the flora and fauna, but it is essential to maintain the country's economy as well. In my opinion, giving unnecessary attention to the wild animals can put nation into various troubles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake the wild beast comfortable and free, zoos are necessary and thus, constructio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93906810036 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6477728946 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9363864982 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252373106415 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097288380476 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646388980561 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159013178256 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678205956225 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.