There are split opinion regarding watching TV. Some believe that it is very good habit to watching TV, while another group of thinkers support watching TV is bad to children. However, both has its own to pros and cons . Therefore, before commenting on my decisions the opinion would be discussed.
To begin with, watching TV is the popular source for entertainment and it is the best way for refreshment in model world. Examining the former opinion, the primary arguments the supporters would be put forward is TV has positive effects on children sucha as, they can know about the new technology, so they can connect with the modern world. In addition, they watching some media channels which gives news about national and international news, so children can be gain our knowledge. Another elss, childrens can be motivated to play sports by watching some sports on TV.
On the other hand, many programms detrimental of the children behaviour such as, they watching WWE programs on TV which effects on their conduct and they always remain angry to watching action programms. Secondly many times children become very lazy and they cannot get right time to play some sport. In add, reduce some physical development and too much screen time is also bad for their eyesight and even they cannot better focus on their study.
To conclude and give my opinion, I would say that watching TV is a more positive effects on children than negative development, however i givesome positive effects is the most appropriate way to deal with this situation.
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior most discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior most discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below show the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The pictures below show the differences in the layout of a conference Centre between its present and its future plan summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- SOME CELEBRITIES SAT THAT THEIR PRIVATE LIVES SHOULD NOT COME UNDER MEDIA SCRUTINY OTHER PEOPLE HOWEVER BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS PART OF THEIR FAME Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...wever, both has its own to pros and cons . Therefore, before commenting on my deci...
^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with, watching TV is the popular source for entertainment and it is the best way...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the children behaviour such as, they watching WWE programs on TV which effect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97683397683 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59656976725 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3831134807 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399095926884 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146458433376 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758630633889 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238206834286 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421744667635 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.