Technology, particularly using it in agriculture has become increasingly prevalent for few years. Using up to dated, and automated facility, moreover, new chemical fertilizers have shown in enhancing the agricultural products. Number of people, consider this improvement as a huge progress in food producing, in spite of, the others which believe in another way. In the following, this essay deals with argument for and against this controversial issue.
First of all, it is undeniable that applying machinery and chemical fertilizer lead to increase the amount of agricultural productions sharply. Regarding the time, in the past people encountered with myriad of trouble to farming all kind of products, namely, fruits and grains due to, lots of problems that process of producing the agricultural products (even a short amount) bring for the farmers. Using powerful machines cause lots of convenient for producer, also new chemical fertilizer with more efficient formula resulted in harvesting, you have flawless products with the best appearance.
Secondly I would content that, for the time being, people have gained enough knowledge about detrimental effects of using chemical fertilizer and using chemical material in the food processing was faced with many opposition in the societies in the whole world. As the statistics illustrate there have been many examples in the countries, which are using chemical fertilizers and pesticides that, show lots of physically and mentally crippled bodies
By the way of conclusion, I believe growing food naturally is more beneficial. Using advanced technology, if it considers this issue, is really profitable for agriculture development. On the other hand I believe this subject is likely to become more important in future. It, therefore, demands out further consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge progress'.
Suggestion: huge progress
...of people, consider this improvement as a huge progress in food producing, in spite of, the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of all, it is undeniable that applying machinery and chemical fertilizer lead ...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lying machinery and chemical fertilizer lead to increase the amount of agricultu...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun opposition seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much opposition', 'a good deal of opposition'.
Suggestion: much opposition; a good deal of opposition
...l in the food processing was faced with many opposition in the societies in the whole world. As...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... physically and mentally crippled bodies By the way of conclusion, I believe grow...
^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ject is likely to become more important in future. It, therefore, demands out further con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, demands out further consideration.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, kind of, by the way, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60649819495 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01628815591 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9326459652 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870080779174 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037562361243 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244523542117 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569693968042 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288454807509 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.