Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed by some people that undergraduates should study university courses that they are interested in. However, others argue that students should be restricted to study science-and-technology-related subjects that are important in the future. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the latter because I believe that allowing people to pursue what they love is the optimal way to benefit themselves and society.
On the one hand, restricting university students to study about science and technology has some benefits. This is simply because when students focus on studying these subjects, they will have more high-paid job opportunities after graduating. Certainly, as science and technology have been playing a crucial role in our modern society, many big firms are having several vacancies for positions related to these fields across the world. For example, Google recruits many programmers each year to help them drive their business successfully. This can help millions of people who want to earn a competitive salary and to have a better living standard, especially those who live in impoverished countries. As a result, people who are majoring in technology or science can have more opportunities to reach financial success in life.
On the other hand, I argue that allowing university students to pursue what they love is even a more effective method of education in general. In fact, every student has their own talents, be it in science, business, or the arts; therefore, if students can learn subjects that they feel comfortable with, they can reach their full potential and perform at their greatest level in their field. For example, if students whose right brain is more active have to study subjects requiring a lot of calculations like mathematics, they cannot compete with students with an agile left brain. As a result, such people will not be satisfied when they have little career success. Worse still, they may disbelieve in their values and abilities.
In conclusion, despite forcing undergraduates to study certain subjects that are important in the future has some benefits, I side with those who think that letting students study what they are interested in can help them achieve more in their future career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in general, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27576601671 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03960608603 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540389972145 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1349753446 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384209662119 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139476093622 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973344349803 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25739661563 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967174929469 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.