Some people think that the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, ecology is deteriorating at very fast pace due to the practices which are performed by civilians for their personal benefits. Some individuals conceive that the up to mark solution of problem is that, increase in the price of fuel for cars and other vehicles. I discord with the assigned assertion as this approach can only restrain the issue up to some extent. This essay intends to examine my views in the upcoming paragraphs of this notion.
To commence with, there are other better remedies which might be effective to eradicate this worrying concern. First and foremost, public transport can be promoted by reducing its fair to encourage the masses to use government vehicles. To elaborate it, regime can provide frequent services of public transportation to their citizens to different destination points, then masses will automatically tend to use these vehicles.Thus, the environment will be less polluted. Moreover, the another considerable point is that, investment in renewable resources such as solar, wind. To demonstrate, these resources do not emit any kind of hazardous chemicals which is phenomenal for environments point of view as well as innovative technology can be used to operate machines while manufacturing goods in industries such as, electronic machines;therefore, the ecology will not be contaminated.
Further emphasizing on my views. Principally, the government can educate people about car pulling and vehicle sharing benefits rather than using one to one vehicle and electric cars can be made by the nation to replace the ongoing vehicles by launching some stringent rules.As a result, the number of personal car which run on fuel can be reduced. Consequently, the environment will not be polluted. Last but not the least, discourage masses for using modern appliances such as refrigerator and air conditioner. To make it more clear, even if these provides comfort to the users while running they emit harmful gases such as CFC due to which ozone layer is vanishing . As a consequence, it would be deleterious for human beings and for environment as well.
To recapitulate, although environment is contaminating; however, government is not taking appropriate steps.I believe that increasing the price of fuel is not the phenomenal solution of this problem. Government can educate the citizens to save the environment by organising aware campaigns.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 84
- Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children Others think parents need not to do that as children can read books or watch TV movies by themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and solution 84
- People spend too much money on family celebrations such as birthdays and weddings What is the importance of these celebrations Do you think people really spend too much 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion as this approach can only restrain the issue up to some extent This essay ...
^^
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the issue up to some extent This essay intends to examine my views in the upcom...
^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different destination points then masses will automatically tend to use these veh...
^^
Line 2, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents point of view as well as innovative technology can be used to operate machin...
^^^
Line 2, column 870, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore the ecology will not be contaminated Further emphasizing on my views Principa...
^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly the environment will not be polluted To recapitulate although environment is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08703675365 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 315.0 20.2975951904 1552% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1680.0 106.682146367 1575% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 315.0 20.7667163134 1517% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 125.0 7.06120827912 1770% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197830838472 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197830838472 0.084324248473 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129327006249 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746961453091 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.2 13.0946893788 1231% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -265.17 50.2224549098 -528% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.5 11.3001002004 1137% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.11 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.07 8.58950901804 280% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.0 10.1190380762 1265% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.7795591182 510% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.