Recycling is the best method to deter waste material, In recent years there is a tremendous increase in waste accumulation. Therefore some people believe that recycling should be a part of the curriculum at the school level in contrast many people supporting the idea of reuse teach at their home itself. I agree with both views and I will explain both aspects in this essay.
Firstly, learning starts from childhood and the best teacher for every person is their parents, so the idea of teaching reuse of material at home is brilliant. In recent years we are following a trend of online shopping and we get a collection of boxes which finally become waste material, however, we can change them in too many DIY activities, for instance, making dustbin, making shoe racks, and other usable things. It can deters the waste and become useful the second time it's a good developmental activity for a child. Eventhough parents spends quality time with their kids,which make them social.
Secondly, we can engage children in recycling at the school level by giving the project, I remember when I was in school we are using waste newspaper for recycling and we are making pots, pottery, paper vas, and many more things, Moreover it develops cognitive skills in a child even though it enhances the group activity. At the school level learning also spread this knowledge to society and it becomes a habit in the future and really curbs the waste material.
In conclusion, both views are important for teaching recycling and minimizing waste materials. I totally agree with these views for adding a good habit in students for reuse and in this era, it is beneficial for them. In the future, we can see new things new ideas for recycled products. From this root level teaching at home as well as at school we becomes able to change the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...mendous increase in waste accumulation. Therefore some people believe that recycling shou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'deter'
Suggestion: deter
... racks, and other usable things. It can deters the waste and become useful the second ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...waste and become useful the second time its a good developmental activity for a chi...
^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ents spends quality time with their kids,which make them social. Secondly, we can e...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...eaching at home as well as at school we becomes able to change the society.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84810126582 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52218961902 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8033746536 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22748156901 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08431335657 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846736814748 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158984125857 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985676614385 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.