the table below shows the results of the survey in 2005,2010 and 2015 about McGill UNIVERSITY.
The table illustrates the proportion of ratings given by students for five different academic sectors in the McGill University survey in the years 2005, 2010, and 2015.
Overall, the rating for library resources was higher as compared to the other four sectors in all three years, while, grading for the Range of modules in all given years was lowest as compared to others. Moreover, sports and social facilities were not showing any change in grade in these years.
Firstly, student services show a gradual increase in grading from 2005 to 2015, which was 54% in the year 2005 in 2010 it increased to 27% and in 2015 it was 95% which was remarkable growth and highest growth as compared to other sectors. On the other hand, teaching quality shows a downfall of 2% in the year 2010, which was at 74% in 2005, however, in the year 2015 it increased 4% as compared to the year 2005.
Consequently, the sports and social facilities were at 65% in all given years, grading to a range of module decreased and depicted a downward trend on the table in the year 2005 it was 39% than in 2010 it decreases to 8% and in 2015 it was 25% which was the lowest rating among all five aspects. Although the Library resources are at a higher level, they are facing slight fluctuation, in year 2010, it was at 88% which decline by 1% in 2015, increased by 1% as compared to 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rating for library resources was higher as compared to the other four sectors in a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51209677419 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41458871936 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459677419355 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.577003219 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4285714286 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223085029327 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131724213382 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100516993833 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169520115644 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114052518183 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.