Undeniable, over the course of time, global labor market becomes more competitive. Therefore, youngsters should offer unique and competitive skills to employers to stand for this fierce competition. Some people defend that young generation is more likely to have effective set of skills by involving in competition with their peer group, while others believe that it can be achieved by co-operating.
On one hand, competition leads to more disciplined environment among children. In schools where children are frequently involved in stand-alone competitions will not make an attempt to conceal the incompliance of their classmates with school regulation. The main reason is that all children are in rivalry and only one person will be announced as a winner. For instance, schools where discipline is a first priority generally offer more awarded case competitions for their students. Competition can be regarded as a useful technique to motivate children to become more disciplined.
On the other hand, teamwork is very effective way for children to learn from each other. Each person possesses different approach for each difficult situation. Therefore, schools can increase problem solving, critical-thinking skills of students by assigning them in same teams. Organizing group works, setting up simulation games that require co-operation among students can be very effective ways for schools to achieve this goal. These activities will make a lasting contribution for children’s’ future careers.
In my opinion, discipline is a main requirement for adults to further their skills. Therefore, I believe that adults ought to lend more weight to competition in children’s growing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72047244094 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25706688862 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1273057703 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209947574671 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716788787624 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049802676225 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119327386545 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304377944139 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.