It is widely believed that class design of universities in each discipline should be in accordance with the principles of gender equality. I strongly agree with this point of view, as I believe that possibility of simultaneous using of variety of interpersonal skills that are unique to each gender and potential rivalry among them will pave the way for both male and female students to achieve their goals more successfully.
First of all, it is undeniable truth each gender group possesses specific biological characteristics. This is because each sex group of students interprets and responds to the number of studies differently. For example, based on very recent research publicized by one of very well-known sociology magazines, it was revealed that female students are more creative and overwhelm presentation tasks more professionally rather than male students. Whereas male students are more capable of controlling their full potential of cerebral capacity and more easily tackle the problems that demand critical-thinking. While it is true that each characteristics plays a pivotal role, separately they do not worth as much as they combined.
Secondly, fierce competition among masculine and feminine students will always lead to positive changes. This is main reason behind the fact that university classes that are in compliance with gender equality produce more challenging results. For example, due to the research by one of the essential university ranking institution, some study classes that are generally below the mean indicators perform better results in which gender equality is met.
To sum up, from gender point of view, equally designed classes will always outperform the non-equal ones by allowing each gender to contribute each other and by increasing the quality due to tough competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...es will always outperform the non-equal ones by allowing each gender to contribute e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for example, first of all, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50533807829 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04164098701 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1522758272 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15259874824 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571806270315 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332176939445 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930951079395 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367051193601 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.