Some people think companies should employ old people to work as they have a lot of working experience. Others, however, think it is better to recruit young people.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether businesses should recruit old people because they have much working experience or whether it brings more benefits to hire young people. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in the essay below before my view on this matter is drawn in the end.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why the employers should hire old people. Firstly, old people have worked for many years so they have accumulated working experience. This might allow them to cope very well with problems related to interpersonal communications both inside and outside of the company, which brings success to the firm they work for. Secondly, their years of experience in the workplace give elderly people the confidence, which helps them not to hesitate to share their recommendations and valuable ideas with managers. As a result, the enterprise will work more efficiently.
On the other hand, I understand why some people believe that the firm should employ young people. From their point of view, younger people are more willing to learn new things and are not burdened by previous experience and ways of doing things. Therefore, the business will not take too much time and effort to train their new staff. Another point to be made is that young people are brought up in the digital and internet age. This help them can absorb the technology at a higher pace, which leads to the fact that innovation and change take place in organizations.
In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that it is more beneficial to employ young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nterprise will work more efficiently. On the other hand, I understand why some...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96212121212 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5564533971 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7716856853 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335211139677 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11564645831 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954772135044 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192006311847 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826515933625 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.