Some people think that dangerous sport should be banned while others believe that people should be free to choose.
Discuss both views and your give your opinion
In many parts of the world today, more folks have concerned about sports. It is hypothesised that governors of nations have more chances to reduce sabotages of dangerous sports if they cease activities which relate to those exercises. This essay attempts to debate numerous aspects of this theme.
There have been various citizens who are in favour the idea. First and foremost, dangerous exercises deem to be not essential in some sides. This can be fathomed that dwellers should not to obtain risks of their health of these sides, and there have been enormous genres of sports which they can go for. It is obvious that sports are elements which thrive physical fitness of people, and people can have more scope to alleviate burdens of work. Therefore, it is superfluous for human to sustain sports which do not associate to that notion. A case in this point, in CNN channel, the figure for detrimental impacts of exercises have been spontaneously restricted after some tactics were implemented. Another possibility is that some safe exercises can be professionally reinforced. It is apparent that numerous sports would be advanced in order to encourage inhabitants. Consequently, this issue can trigger some appeal elements which entail innovations. Indeed, these tenets have been demonstrated clearly due to the VNN sport organisation in Vietnam. There are diverse creative activities which are irresistible to students currently. Furthermore, people can gain more incentives to be approach sports. By virtue of the fact that some folks have been frightened about sports due to some rumours. As a result, they can be more confident in exercises.
Vice versa, some dwellers do not support that solution owing to some facts. First of all, people have their own rights to go for their hobbies. This means that folks perceive unfair , so sensations of human can be deleteriously affected. A case in this point, in Vietnamnn articles, in Vietnam in 2010, governments of this region reluctantly endured a tough period. Some dwellers strove their best to create terrible spectacles which rejected restrictions of some sports after some laws had been rendered by governors. Aside from that, some people have deemed that it is not necessary to suppress prospects of dangerous sports. It is assumed that people should attain some obstacles or standard tests so that they can be in authority to choose risky activities. These suggestions were strongly triggered by most interviewee in CNN programs in 2015. As a bonus, government would compulsorily tackle employment for folks if some sports were ceased by policies. In fact, the number of dangerous exercises these days have been enormous.
In short, beneficial points of this theme should be regarded by aforementioned views. Besides, folks should not underestimate drawbacks of these tactics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. A case in this point, in CNN channel, the figure for detrimental impacts of ex...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. This means that folks perceive unfair , so sensations of human can be deleterio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, in short, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 454.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25991189427 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8318320986 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513215859031 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9205687772 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3448275862 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6551724138 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86206896552 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210189987257 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634477490444 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528628209999 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134980791409 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634819895037 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.