Some people think that economic growth is the only way to stop world‘s poverty and hunger,
while others say that economic growth is the cause of environmental disasters. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the cons and consequences of economic development. Whether economic growth is the optimized method to tackle world poverty or the reason for the deterioration of the environment has caused heated debates. In my opinion, the development of an economy is able to improve social poverty but also leads to serious environmental harmless if such economic growth were not properly controlled.
First, it is obvious that the poor is stemmed from a weak economy, in this economic system, fortunes taken from economic ’s activities can not meet the basic human needs. This means that in the undeveloped economy, the taxation ‘s money was is not enough to pay for public services such as health care services, welfare systems and so on, even for proving food for citizens. So, the solution for improving the poor of nations is enhancing economic ability in order to provide financial resources to cope with social problems.
Second, it is clear that in order to strengthen the nation ‘s economy, some uncontrollable operations of factories and exploiting activities have posed serious environmental issues. This is due to the failure of the government in monitoring economic activities, leading to damage the environmental habitats. For example, factories can leak toxic water to surrounded rivers and so on. But those negative effects can be controlled and dismissed by strict policies, laws, and critical authorities' supervision. So, environmental deterioration should not be the responsibility of governments and authorities, not be blamed for economic growth.
In sum, economic development certainly can solve poverty and hunger. Besides, in order to eliminate the environmental damage risks, governments and individuals should pool their hands to control and ensure a sustainable economy. Only by doing so can we make the most of economic growth to deal with social unwealthy and environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
... by strict policies, laws, and critical authorities supervision. So, environmental deterior...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial unwealthy and environmental issues.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, then, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49836065574 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08870905439 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5861241408 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24839426003 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090798522191 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652468774359 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161882365983 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673593026709 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.