Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that the funding from the government should not be spent on culture and art. However, others support that funding for cultural activities can benefit individuals and the culture. In my opinion, funding for these factors is more advantageous and this essay will discuss both views and explain the reasons.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people may think that art and culture are not worth being funded. The first belief might depend on the assumption that funding for these aspects is expensive because some cultural-related forms such as traditional sculptures require a significant amount of money for yearly preservation. Another explanation for the disapproval is that some individuals consider art or cultural activities unnecessary to invest money in since their impact is thought to be superior to that of health and education. For instance, they argue that investments in healthcare or education yield immediate benefits for the population. However, it's crucial to recognize that cultural enrichment also plays a pivotal role in societal development and preserving national identity.
On the other hand, cultural activities can have many benefits to the culture and people of the society, which I trust to be more impactful than the drawbacks. Art and culture are closely related to a country's origin and history, thereby investing money to promote these can help educate citizens about the beauty of national identity. Moreover, cultures and artistic masterpieces can differentiate a country's identity from others. Tuong, for instance, a traditional music genre of Vietnam, is famous for its unique ways of performing compared to other genres. Therefore, allocating funds for the promotion and preservation of these aspects is not only beneficial but also essential in showcasing the rich tapestry of a nation's heritage.
In conclusion, although some people perceive that it can be excessive and expensive for the government to invest in art and culture. However, I believe that, with an appropriate amount of money spent on these factors, the national identity of citizens and the identification of a country can be made more prominent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...al in showcasing the rich tapestry of a nations heritage. In conclusion, although so...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40643274854 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94953305131 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3985899353 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454847844472 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162512748965 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982994078514 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296442014674 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120875326112 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.