Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While several people against the idea of spending the national budget on aesthetic or cultural activities, there are many others, including me, believe that these activities can bring a wide range of beneficial impacts on not only the community but also the culture itself. Both of the pre-mentioned points of view will be addressed in this essay
On the one hand, one could draw the conclusion that government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture due to various reasons. For the most part, one explanation that remarkably stands out is the expenditure priority. There seems to be no doubt that social and economic development should be the prerequisite when it comes to governmental expenses. Therefore, spending on aesthetic and cultural advancement can lead to insufficient funding when necessitated. By the way of illustration, expenditure on preserving paintings can be used to construct more academic institutions in remote regions so that local people can access to education without any difficulty
Nevertheless, there is a variety of justifications for the beneficial effects of art and cultural activities on the population and culture itself. The first and foremost reason is that art and culture play a pivotal role in the mental well-being of humanity. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that people are less likely to suffer from psychological illnesses namely autism or depression if they have a healthy spiritual life. Another worth-considering reason is that these activities made a great contribution to preserve cultural diversity. In such a globalised world where the intersection between cultures is more and more intense, cultural identity is faded more straightforwardly than ever. Hence, maintaining them through cultural exhibits can be a good means of conservation and deserve government financial support
In conclusion, one could claim that national funding should be spent on more important issues rather than art and culture. However, I believe that cultural activities require government financial support due to their benefits on people' mental life as well as their contribution to preserving cultural diversity
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | gtuez | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 95 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | jojilover | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that educational success depends on good teachers Others think that it s depends on the attitude of the students Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52537313433 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18367130467 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4378378524 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.25 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427115381599 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147444929479 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847485217696 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255872411648 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498736238821 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52537313433 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18367130467 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4378378524 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.25 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427115381599 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147444929479 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847485217696 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255872411648 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498736238821 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.