There is no doubt that public art needs funding. People have different views about who should support it. While the support of the government is essential, I agree with those who believe that other sources of funding should be considered.
Some people insist that governments must support public art financially. Governments collect taxes from the public, and funding public art is the right way for them to pay back. Public art can improve the living environment and its aesthetics. Governments can give citizens instant access to works of art by placing sculptures and paintings in public squares. Moreover, unlike private companies, governments are more likely to invest in public art, which needs regular repairs and maintenance, because it is a long-term investment without noticeable financial returns. Therefore, funds from governments are necessary.
Even so, in my opinion, governments have other areas to focus on. For example, providing education and healthcare is more important than supporting the arts and artists. Therefore, instead of spending millions for promoting arts, the government should encourage its citizens and other organizations to promote the arts. For example, when companies promote public art, they also get to advertise their brand and enhance its value. People can also use public art to support the causes they believe in. Governments can encourage public funding of arts by giving them some tax rebates.
To conclude, public art certainly needs funding because it has a positive influence on many aspects of life. In my opinion, since governments already have heavy financial burdens on their shoulders, there is no justification for them to spend vast amounts of money on promoting arts. Instead, they should encourage private organizations and individuals to invest in public arts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, even so, for example, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46643109541 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8078112949 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544169611307 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7499187784 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9444444444 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250402930501 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945504908893 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428210967321 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17490452267 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272560873095 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.