It is argued that governments should look after those facing difficulty in society. From my perspective, I strongly agree with this statement to some extent.
Firstly, the disadvantaged people are presumably getting lost in determining their lives’ orientation. This can lead to detrimental impacts on society if they have distorted selections like committing crimes. For example, a great number of youngers in Brazil must turn to criminals in an attempt to make ends meet, which provides Brazil with a disgusting face over the rest of the world. This problem has been deeply criticised by many nations since Brazil hosted the 2018 World Cup. Therefore, the government should enact financial programs dedicated to improving living standards for those who have difficulty.
Secondly, decreasing unemployment rates can help increase the national economy in a country. This is because the people will earn a stable income to settle down, and then, play a crucial point in the sustainable development of their country. The Vietnamese authorities, for instance, has imposed countless incentives and tax breaks for potential big foreign companies, attracting billions of dollars of investment to build factories across the country which solves the unemployment rate and enhances the working forces’ living standards significantly. As a result, governments allocating their budget to taking care of people facing difficulty is of paramount importance.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should have more useful programs to take care of their disadvantaged citizens because of the abovementioned benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6652892562 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07732519124 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673553719008 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6988091907 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209470329781 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740277262725 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705697019247 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123129436728 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321073585162 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.