Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Opinions are divided on whether money should be invested in faster means of public transport or whether the government should spend it on other urgencies. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in the essay below before my view on this matter is drawn in the end.

I understand why some people believe that the faster means of public transport need to be invested in. From their point of view, when public transport is upgraded to be faster it can help ease traffic congestion. In fact, with speedy means of public transport will encourage people use it instead of private vehicles. Another point to be made is that people can achieve the time efficiency. Instead of spending much time on commuting, people can have proper breakfast, get unfinished tasks done or work productively at the beginning of a day. As a result, they can reduce daily work load.

On the other hand, there are some reasons why the government should spend money on other priorities. This is due to the fact that the economic zones are becoming more popular which means various factories are built without proper waste treatment systems, which leads to exhaust fumes and polluted water. So the government should support to build standard waste treatment factories to restrict the amount of emission released to protect the health of resident population. Another reason to be given is that the lack of medical centers in remote areas. It means that people have to travel far distance to get there. The government should consider to build more medical centers at necessary places, which are opened 24 hours a day, have modern facilities and well-trained staff. This will help people receive timely treatment and ensure their health.

In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that the government should spend money on other priorities.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult, they can reduce daily work load. On the other hand, there are some reason...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02295081967 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50547157218 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527868852459 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1184620297 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357698815188 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116126553309 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117436995002 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235614315675 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737225405804 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.